Free labour will not always be thanked

I have been given the impression that back in the old days of journalism, to get into the field, you started at the bottom at a newspaper and worked yourself up. That seems to have changed in the recent decades.

Not only are you now expected to have a degree in journalism, but before someone even considers hiring you as a journalist, you are expected to already have a portfolio to show them. This means that most of the time, instead of working at one specific newspaper, you end up having to work a bit here and there — which has its pros and cons.

In the beginning the most common payment is experience and maybe even a byline. Seeing your own name in print is the best confidence-booster for a young journalist.

The downside of this is that it is often exploited. When you have finished your internship you are lucky to end up with a paid gig at that very same paper — so I have been told. Even worse are those who base their business model on only hiring journalists for free — being very open that you will never receive a pay cheque from them — ever.

It of course looks good to have a portfolio where you have had a constant flow of published work with a byline, and that it has been varied — now that journalists are expected to have a broad skill set.

That is however not why I decided to write this piece. Because it is not until you resign— if you can call it that —from one of your unpaid gigs you find out if your work was really appreciated.

I have resigned twice in my career as a journalist. Both provided me with two very different responses.

The first time I did it I received a very nice email back, where I was thanked for my contribution and that I am more than welcome to return.

The second experience was less than impressive. It started to go downhill even before I decided to say goodbye to them.

For over a month I had not received any responses to my two recent write-ups for them. Usually I would receive feedback and a notification within a week that the write-up was published. This time, all I heard was crickets chirping. Additionally I had grown tired of writing the same stuff over and over again, so I eventually decided to send them a very friendly and polite resignation email.

Chirp, chirp.

That was the thanks I received for writing for free for that publication. Sure, I got published, received amazing feedback and had a byline, but in the end I did not receive a thank you — all I received was silence.

As a young journalist you are often told— not exclusive to journalism mind you —to be professional, polite and generally swallow your pride so you can— if you read between the subtle lines —be a brown-nose. Never question, always do what you are told. In other words, forget your ideals and become a silhouette.

This is something I have an issue with. I do not mind acting professional and humble, to show I am very capable of doing the job and acquiring a lot of experience — before I start making demands. But I am not interested in keeping this cheeky and ungrateful culture alive. If I am going to contribute for free— where my only payment is experience and a byline —I expect that my bonus payment, when I decide to leave, is at least a bloody thank you.

Or if they want to keep me, send me a check I can cash in.

With that said, I still do a few free gigs here and there. Not because I have to, but because I want to and am addicted to journalism.

About these ads

Academia disrupts my journalistic mojo

It is not an easy balancing act, being a freelance journalist and a full-time academic. One is fairly scheduled and eating up space in my calendar, while the other suffers for those exact reasons. Not really how I like it, as it makes me drink more, use more snus (Swedish smokeless tobacco) and leaves me exhausted every day.

It is Saturday, just before 10 pm, when I’m typing this exact sentence — I am at home. Just clocked out for an hour or so from a presentation I am working on. Gathering sources, piecing together information for a slide show and drafting a short script.

The thought of putting on some music after I publish this short write-up is very appealing. What is unfortunately not so appealing is reading a book, even if I want to. The thing with academia is that you kind of get sick of reading, mainly because you often have to read things that you already know or find mind-numbingly boring. Do not get me wrong tho, academia has taught me a lot of good and interesting things, but that is the issue. Certain things I prefer to stay as good and interesting, not having to take the step further and be tested to check if I have memorised it verbatim.

Attaining knowledge is of course the least of my dismay. It is the lack of time to actually work as a journalist that suffers.

Oh, sorry. I have a 2000-word academic essay due soon, so I can not cover that story for you. Maybe next time?

Between trying to find time for journalism and academia, I also need to try to be social and spend time with the missus. Maybe also try to stay active, instead of sitting hunched over a keyboard all day and all night, consuming snus, energy drinks— during the day to keep me going —and beer— at night to wind my mind down.

Living like this does however teach me how to be better at prioritising tasks and obligations. Not to mention, understanding that mostly ignoring things that will benefit me now, instead looking at what will benefit me years to come.

It is kind of ironic tho, that my degree in journalism is somewhat in the way of my career as a journalist — holding me back a bit … for now.