Tag Archives: editor

Dokter’s Weekly Report #15

Posted by

It seems like the big media houses and even the editors act like drug dealers. Only care about the big score. Earning a big buck as fast as they can – now. Tomorrow, not so important. Next week, who cares with all this fast cash?!

Been an interesting week at BIFF. Second year I’m covering it for The Westender. Yet another exciting time. Picking mostly great films and documentaries. The last reviews will be finished very soon and filed for publication.

In the mean time I’ve kept myself busy researching a column on the weirdest guy ever. He caught my eye last weekend, and since then I’ve been tracking his very odd behaviour on Twitter. I’ve tried to get in touch with the guy, but he refuses to speak to me. Yet he has no inhibitions on posting the move vile tweets publicly. Which kind of wraps up the research at this point. I don’t think or hope he will come with anything worse. I already have heaps of information to write a lengthy column about this guy.

I will of course let you all know when it will be published and where.

Enjoy rest of the report.

Linkage

Journalism once had Woodward and Bernstein. Now it’s guns for hire – Read it
The same old conundrum keeps coming up. Everyone one wants investigative journalism, but no one wants to pay for it. Weird no one learned from the faults of the entertainments industry. Give the consumers what they want and they will pay for it. Or else they’ll find a way to get it for free and even make it themselves.

Never Apologize For Having An Opinion — Especially When You’re Right – Read it
A wonderful piece of writing. Bringing up the issue I have with the so-called objective journalism and fake balance. If you have the facts on your side, say it!

Tweetage

About these ads

Thoughts on the future of journalism

Posted by

After reading the article I discovered 140 characters will not suffice. Before reading my following musings, please read the above article.

The Students
It is scary how naive these students sound. Just because you can find a lot of information online they readily believe any information will be available. Just visit Google, search and you will be given whatever you look for.

What if what they searched for didn’t provide anything, would these blue-eyed whippersnappers interpret that as a confirmation that what they were looking for doesn’t exist? A bit scary. However, good news for me, because that means the bar isn’t set high; more accurately, the bar is probably lying on the ground somewhere in a frat house.

Citizen Journalists & Bloggers
Every blue moon there is that one citizen journalist (blogger) who really amazes and puts real journalists to shame. Their luxury is that they don’t have an editor breathing down their neck, asking you not to write something because it might upset the investors. Which means they ca break a story anytime. That is however their weakness, as they might not have someone to force them to fact-check if the story is correct.

Shoe-leather Journalists
The trained and even educated journalist. Most of the time worked hard to get to where they are. Too familiar with gatekeeping and laws. Forced to cut corners to break the latest story. Instead of maybe working on a story for weeks, they now how only hours to beat the competing paper or even the too eager local blogger.

There seem to be a lot of good journalists still out there, but they aren’t given a chance anymore. The are told they must follow the 24h deadline.

The old shoe-leather journalist still exist, but is not forced out of existence because of technology, but because of revenue and the absurd belief readers only want breaking news and want to pay for it.

Old Media
It has stagnated the same way the entertainment business has. Entertainment consumers has voiced what they want, instead the entertainment refuses to move forward. The end result, BitTorrent.

The same might happen to the media if something isn’t done quick. However, it might be a good thing – let the old dinosaurs die and let the younger journalists create their own up-to-date media houses.

New Media
The only competition the media should feel are coming from bloggers are quality. Washington Post not only has blogs, but use WordPress to host them. As John Birmingham mentioned, when the New Yorker released their iPad app their subscriptions went up.

Readers don’t want to pay for breaking news. What they however are willing to pay for are quality articles. Well written and longer than 140 characters.

The End
As mentioned, the media must not only understand that readers won’t pay for breaking news, but they also need to understand that journalist will go and stay with those who let them be true journalists – the shoe-leather kind.

The entertainment business claimed BitTorrent would kill the business. So far it seems to do pretty well. However, you can see only a handful who provide what consumers want; iTMS, Spotify and NetFlix, to mention a very few.

The same will happen to the media, if they don’t change with times and value their journalists and quality reporting.

I’m at the bottom of my glass of vodka now. Thoughts might become more erratic, but I think I’ve gotten my message across.

As a journalist, if I ever end up at a paper like Washington Post I’ll be ecstatic, but end of the day, as long as I’m allowed to do what I want as a journalist and paid for it, I don’t really care who hires me. But that’s the problem – will there be anyone left to hire trained journalists in the future? Or will we be left with bloggers who get their income from ads?